Olixar Exoshield Tough Snap-on iPhone X Case - Crystal Clear - Clearance

Custom moulded for the iPhone X. This crystal clear Olixar ExoShield tough case provides a slim fitting stylish design and reinforced corner shock protection against damage, keeping your device looking great at all times.Made from robust and hard-wearing materialsfor long lasting protectionEach Olixar ExoShield case is made fromreinforced bonded thermopolyurethaneand high quality polycabornate materials, which makes it flexible enough to absorb punishment but hard enough to resist potential damage.Reinforced corners provide excellent protection where it's most neededTaking the classic snap-on shell design and adding reinforcementwhere you need it most, the ExoShield provides better protection than any othercase of that type. The vulnerable corners of your phone are the most exposed area should you ever happen to drop it, so the added peace of mindthereinforced corners provide is priceless - especially for the slight increase in size. Not only do the corner bumpers extend outwards across the length and width of your phone, they also extend out across the depth of your phone. This is important because it adds screen protection by keeping it off from any flat surface.It alsoprotects the raised rear camera too in much the same way.Non-slip coatingfor extra gripThe selectedmaterials used havea non-slip coating that provides you with extra grip for your phone, which minimises the chance of dropping your device - meaning this case is professional enough for work and sporty enough for play. And after all, the best defence against drop damage is not dropping your phone in the first place.Slim fitting design adds no very little bulk and fits perfectly in your pocketThe Olixar ExoShield case is designed to be slim, lightweight and strong - so you can be assured that this case will add virtually no extra bulk to your iPhone Xand will still fit in your pocket with ease.Raised bezels on the case protects your iPhone X's screen and camera from scratches and dirtThis case has a raised bezel that prevents your iPhone X's screen from coming into contact with any flat surface when you place the phone face down. This prevents your iPhone X's screen from getting any unwanted scratches and dirt on it. In terms of camera protection, the ExoShield also excels here with the bezel extending beyond the rear of the case and being easily the first point of contact with any impact, rather than your precious camera lens. Keep snapping without any horrible scuffing and scratching getting in the way.Wireless charging compatibleEnjoy the benefits of wirelessly charging your iPhone even with the case on using any Qi-compatible wireless charging pad. Protect your phone from any possible harm and still charge your phone using the modern spectacle of wireless charging.Cut-outs for all the iPhone X's features and ports so you'll never need to take the case offEach Olixar ExoShield has been designed specifically for the iPhone X and features cut-outs for the various ports and features - such as the rear facing camerasand charging port. There are also button covers to protect the phone's vulnerable controls.

"The entire nonprofit community has gotten behind the same bill," says ACLU legislative counsel Michelle Richardson, "it's the USA Freedom Act." Some, however, including the EFF's Opsahl, have said that though it's a great start, it doesn't go far enough. The coming year will see various members of Congress campaigning for re-election, and "people in election years usually want to get everything done in the first six months," says Richardson. That, and the obvious visibility of the NSA issue, may discourage any delays on hashing out these two proposals and ultimately picking a winner.

The big news in the judicial realm as we head into 2014? The cat's out of the secret court, Oh, and there's a chance privacy law will catch up to the Digital Age, US District Judge Richard J, Leon, in a case called Klayman v, Obama, is the one who in late December called the NSA's bulk collection of phone metadata "almost Orwellian." And he's also the one who's freed the cat, "In granting the plaintiffs [in the case] legal standing to sue the government on the grounds that they, most likely, had had their phone records seized," The New Yorker's John Cassidy writes, Judge Leon "breached olixar exoshield tough snap-on iphone x case - crystal clear the wall that had kept the legal arguments about domestic surveillance confined inside the secretive FISA court."In his ruling, Leon wrote that "while Congress has great latitude to create statutory schemes like FISA, it may not hang a cloak of secrecy over the Constitution."And so, in the words of the EFF's Opsahl, "over the course of the next year, we're going to have open-court analysis of these programs, where judges will have heard from both sides and seen the problems with the government's arguments, and I think that's going to be very useful for assessing the legality and also helping the judges and the public understand what's going on."Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor may well have a point about privacy in the Digital Age...

What, then, is likely to come up? And what of the Digital Age? Well, as the Klayman case goes to appeal -- and other cases, such as those filed by the EFF and the ACLU, wend their way through the courts -- we'll no doubt be hearing a fair amount about two Supreme Court cases: Smith v. Maryland, from 1979, and 2012's United States v. Jones. In justifying the NSA's warrantless collection of phone and other metadata, the government relies heavily on the Supreme Court's finding in Smith that the plaintiff in the case didn't have a reasonable expectation of keeping the telephone numbers he dialed private. That's because, the court said, he freely transmitted the numbers to the phone company and knew they'd be recorded. In his December 27 ruling in favor of the NSA in the case brought by the ACLU, Judge William Pauley found much to like in the Smith precedent.

But critics of the NSA's application of that precedent to its bulk, suspicionless surveillance programs say the Smith case isn't relevant: It had to do with the collection, by law enforcement, of a single person's phone-call data for two days, And the police, though they hadn't requested a probable-cause warrant, had compelling evidence the person was guilty of olixar exoshield tough snap-on iphone x case - crystal clear a crime, How could that reasonably be extended to the collection of everyone's metadata all the time?, Beyond that, however, is the fact that the Smith ruling is more than 30 years old, and, as we all know (while perhaps reading this article on a laptop or a tablet or a smartphone) a lot has changed in that span..

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor makes this point in her concurring opinion in US v. Jones, a case related to the placing of a GPS device on a suspect's car. Citing the Smith ruling, she writes. "It may be necessary to reconsider the premise that an individual has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information voluntarily disclosed to third parties. This approach is ill suited to the Digital Age, in which people reveal a great deal of information about themselves to third parties in the course of carrying out mundane tasks. People disclose the phone numbers that they dial or text to their cellular providers; the URLs that they visit and the e-mail addresses with which they correspond to their Internet service providers; and the books, groceries, and medications they purchase to online retailers. Perhaps, as Justice Alito notes, some people may find the "tradeoff" of privacy for convenience "worthwhile," or come to accept this "diminution of privacy" as "inevitable," and perhaps not. I for one doubt that people would accept without complaint the warrantless disclosure to the Government of a list of every Web site they had visited in the last week, or month, or year."And in the Klayman ruling, Judge Leon is on Sotomayor's wavelength, also citing Smith. "When," he writes, "do present day circumstances -- the evolution in the government's surveillance capabilities, citizens' phone habits, and the relationship between the NSA and telecom companies -- become so thoroughly unlike those considered by the Supreme Court 34 years ago that a precedent like Smith does not apply. The answer, unfortunately for the government, is now."..and so may US District Judge Richard J. Leon.

Leon's ruling has "invited higher courts, and ultimately the Supreme Court, to revisit the entire issue of how privacy can be defined, and protected, in the information age," The New Yorker's Cassidy writes, And that may not work out so well for the NSA and its supporters, We're not likely to see the Supreme Court weigh in on the intelligence agency's spy programs in 2014, says the EFF's Opsahl, After all, we don't yet have even an appellate court ruling on an NSA case, But, he says, you never know: "It's possible for the Supreme Court to act very quickly, You may recall in the Bush v, Gore olixar exoshield tough snap-on iphone x case - crystal clear case concerning the 2000 election, the court moved quite rapidly." And Dianne Feinstein herself says she hopes the Supreme Court will take on the Klayman case..

How would the Supremes rule? In the Jones GPS case, says Opsahl, five of the justices were signaling, in separate opinions, that they were ready "to provide some clarification that would put some doubt on the Smith v. Maryland case the DOJ is urging" and "that's all you need for a positive Supreme Court decision."But who knows? Feinstein points out that "Judge Leon's opinion..differs from those of at least 15 separate federal district court judges who sit, or have sat, on the FISA Court."In any, um, case, this time around we'll get the chance to observe the proceedings.

What we may likely see first in 2014 regarding NSA reform is at least some action from President Obama on the recent recommendations made by the independent panel he assembled to review the agency's spy programs, During the last regularly scheduled White House press conference of the year, on December 20, Obama said that come January olixar exoshield tough snap-on iphone x case - crystal clear he'd make a "pretty definitive" statement about the panel's suggestions, And those suggestions are a "game changer," Greg Nojeim, an attorney for privacy group the Center for Democracy and Technology, told Beltway blog The Hill, The consensus seems to be that the relatively aggressive suggestions for reform in the group's 300+ page report (PDF) took the White House by surprise, and could force Obama to alter policy to a greater extent than he otherwise might have, Still, it's a matter of debate as to just how much the recommendations -- even if fully implemented -- would change the key components of the intelligence community's game..



Recent Posts